![]() Whereas Affleck had been operating in Gotham for 20 years and dealing with the worst of the worst, Pattinson has only just begun his journey as the Dark Knight. These two versions of Batman are in opposite stages of their superhero career and therefore are experiencing vastly different emotions. However, while both Affleck and Pattinson’s Batman are violent, the source of Batman’s anger is vastly different. Related: How Affleck's Movie Would've Been Different From Pattinson's The Batman This brutality was blamed on Zack Snyder’s dark vision for Batman, but it seems Matt Reeves' take on Batman will also showcase a violent caped crusader. Many considered this ruthless nature and complete disregard for human life off-character and wished to see a more familiar Batman. When Affleck’s Batman debuted in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice audiences were introduced to a Batman unafraid to allow criminals to die if they stood in his way. This anger is repeatedly demonstrated by Pattinson’s Batman in the trailers as they showcase the young vigilante violently assaulting several thugs and delivering the iconic line, “ I’m vengeance.” It’s clear Pattinson’s Batman is looking to make his mark on Gotham City’s underworld.īatman’s anger represents a classic element of his character and over the years has provoked some controversy in terms of how this anger manifests. recently released the official synopsis for The Batman and it details Pattinson’s journey as a “ disillusioned” and “ desperate vigilante” who realizes his violent actions make him no better than the serial killer he’s chasing. Pattinson’s anger as Batman in The Batman will be the opposite of Affleck’s brutal behavior as the Dark Knight. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |